www.DemsMoveOn.org
Dear Hillary Supporters,

We have heard you loud and clear! You are not voting for Obama.

Some of you have said that you are;
voting a third party, or
writing Hillary's name in, or
staying home on election day.

But many of you said that you're voting for McCain/Palin to clear the path for Hillary to run again in 2012.
How BOLD.
Welcome to DEMSMOVEONG.ORG

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

Why I’m (Finally) Supporting Sarah Palin

-Why I’m (Finally) Supporting Sarah Palin
by Paulie Abeles

Since John McCain announced Sara Palin as his running mate, like many of you I suspect, I’ve been constantly asked: “What do you think of Sarah Palin?”
The struggle that I’ve been going through in trying to answer that question honestly, is that all the things I find compelling about her:
that she’s attractive and charismatic, has a great personal narrative, is eloquent, a 'breath of fresh air'--yes, even "tokenism" (for lack of a better word)
were also true of Obama. And, I, like many Clinton supporters, decided those were not sufficiently strong reasons to support him.

So, in one sense, I would feel like a hypocrite supporting Palin for any of those reasons.

Although I think she is more experienced than Obama—(She, has, after all, directed a budget of over $10 billion, supervised 24,000 employees and negotiated with foreign governments -Russia and China over fishing rights); she is lightly credentialed in terms of the possible field of socially progressive Republican women McCain could have chosen (Snowe, Whitman, Hutchinson etc.).
And, although I respect her integrity, there is virtually no social issue on which I share common ground with Sarah Palin. Unlike John McCain, who has never been ideological; Sarah Palin is, and unabashedly so.

However as I’ve struggled with these issues since her selection, I keep coming back to two points.
Of all the basic rights—human rights-- that Democrats have stood for---there are two that seem to me to be the most important:
the right to vote (and have that vote counted fairly) and the right to free speech.

The right to vote, it seems to me, is not simply about exercising your franchise—but actually having that exercise tied to a result. Whether we look narrowly at Florida and Michigan, or broadly at caucus and convention intimidation and fraud—what becomes clear—crystal clear—is that the delegates—both in number and composition-- did not accurately represent the ‘will of the people’ that voted for them. And, as a tribute to their organizational skill, if not their integrity, the Obama campaign did everything in their power to ensure that that would be the case.
Just as importantly, throughout the nomination process, the Obama campaign did everything possible to curtail the free speech of those who opposed him. Whether it was as simple as harassing supporters at the local metro, or as brazen as intimidating delegates at state conventions and threatening members of the Black Caucus---opposition to Barack Obama put people at risk—to be taunted, insulted and harassed in a way I’ve never before experienced in a political campaign.

So, I come down to this. Do we believe that the Obama campaign curtailed the freedom of speech of those who opposed him? Do we believe that Clinton’s supporter’s votes were not counted fairly? If we answer ‘yes; as I have answered, than it seems to me that the fact that we disagree with Sarah Palin on reproductive choice, or creationism, or even protecting the Polar Bears—is the human rights equivalent of small potatoes. There are two basic rights that make us a democracy; two essential rights that keep us free. If I have my voice—and my vote—I can work for all the other issues. Without them, I can do nothing.

So, this fall I will vote for John McCain and, yes, Sarah Palin. I will vote as a protest, and as a promise. A protest at what took place; a promise that it will never happen again. I will vote as a democrat.


Paulie Abeles is co-founder of Real Democrats (www.RealDemocratsUSA.org)




Click Here To Subscribe To The Blog

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Wow. You would turn your back on Ms. Clinton and everything she fought for, sell out your country and your own basic rights, ruin any chance of a woman getting elected to the office in the next 50 years (rest assured, Palin's screwups, and there will be many, WILL be blamed on gender) and allow the continued destruction of your country- all out of spite, because Hillary lost?
Maybe McBush's campaign was right. Maybe Americans really are that stupid. Some, anyway.

Anonymous said...

This BLOG sight is pathetic and a stab in the back to the Democratic Party. I too was a Hillary supporter, and was disappointed in the fact that the votes just were not out there for her. BUT I would NEVER EVER turn my back on my party. I do not want 4 years more of Christian/Right wing politics in the White House. I am a women who wants to protect her rights and as long as Mrs. Palin is VP my rights are in question everyday. DEMSMOVEON??? How about DEMSHAVINGAFIT or DEMSHALFCOCKED

Anonymous said...

It is incredible that anyone believes the McCain/Palin camp will not do anything in their power to disenfranchise potential Obama/Biden voters. These efforts may only be surpassed by their efforts, if elected, to violate the freedom of speech of anyone who disagrees with them on issues like reproductive rights and the environment...

Anonymous said...

I had voted for the Democratic Party for many decades, but I will vote McCain/Palin in November. This is not a "protest" vote.

I usually vote for a person whom I think will be a better leader for this great country (of course I did not vote for Mr. Bush). Mr. Obama is only a great speaker (with the aids of his advisors). I consider the country before the party.

Unknown said...

I am voting for Obama. To vote for the Republicans is like stabbing Hilliary and everything she stands for. Hilliary should have an important part of the Obama Staff. To have the Republicans in control is like hiring Hitler to control the world. Palin is a woman. There are a lot of women in the world, but I would not vote them in office. Really! Palin is not Hilliary and they support completely different platforms. Wake up Women of America!

Anonymous said...

Thank you for this well thought-out piece, Paulie. Country - and democracy - before party. Sure, no one is absolutely certain that the Republicans will represent Democrats' desires, but the basic issue of Ms Abeles is missed by all the negative critics here - Obama's campaign has already shown solid proof that the man does not respect the voters' will. McCain, at least, has shown he actually works across the aisle with Democrats in the US Senate, unlike Obama.

Despite all your denials, Obamabots, Palin DOES have EXECUTIVE experience, which is what one needs in the White House. Besides, she's running for the VP slot - so why is the Dem presidential nominee attacking the vice-presidential nominee on the opposite ticket? Does she frighten him that much that he forgoes the usual role of presidential nominee to be more statesmanlike, and decides to attack her with the lowest means possible? Just as he did Hillary Clinton? Does this man have a problem with strong, intelligent women? Huh?


To those who claim Hillary will have a voice in an Obama presidency - REALLY? He did not even have the courtesy of calling her HIMSELF to let her know she wasn't the VP nom, but let an aide call her; and didn't even bother to vet her for the position. And he just happened to forget to ask the audience at a fundraiser to help pay down Hillary's campaign debt. And he didn't even return any calls made by Bill Clinton to him, and never bothered to humbly ask the opinion of the Clintons re campaigning. Should I go on?

Anonymous said...

Obamacrats want us to overlook that the Democratic party turned its back on Hillary and 18 million supporters. Corrupt caucuses delivered results to Chicago- beginner (made his bones); this insult, taunt, and threat is not "hope&change" but corruption, that must be stopped before it spreads. NoObama, no way, no how, No bHO.